Archive through January 05, 2016

IH Cub Cadet Tractor Forum

Help Support IH Cub Cadet Tractor Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Charlie, I do?
bouncy.gif
noshare.gif
bannana_guitar.gif
angel.gif


To bad <FONT COLOR="ff0000">I</FONT><FONT COLOR="000000">H</FONT> never built this concept Cub Cadet. I'd love to have it.

301408.jpg


301409.jpg
 

Attachments

  • bouncy.gif
    bouncy.gif
    2 KB · Views: 106
  • noshare.gif
    noshare.gif
    6.5 KB · Views: 110
  • bannana_guitar.gif
    bannana_guitar.gif
    2.8 KB · Views: 105
  • angel.gif
    angel.gif
    222 bytes · Views: 104
  • 301408.jpg
    301408.jpg
    224.6 KB · Views: 111
  • 301409.jpg
    301409.jpg
    220.9 KB · Views: 108
  • 301408.jpg
    301408.jpg
    224.6 KB · Views: 110
  • 301409.jpg
    301409.jpg
    220.9 KB · Views: 107
IF IH still built Cubs, they would either all be red and say CASE or be painted blue and say NEW HOLLAND!

And stay in the good graces... I Love CCSpecialties!
 
Haha, what if?

Chances are if IH wouldn't have had to sell of CC there would be no such takeover by Tenneco, and the evolution that would have been CNH to swallow it up. Providing there wouldn't have been another strike and that the TRX program would have given worldwide commonality back to Harvester, saving quite a bit of cost. IHC would have likely still bought the Steiger plant in Fargo. It may have also been in a position to swallow up Ford New Holland in 1991 before Fiat did (and maybe leverage the distance and product between Steiger in Fargo and Versatile in Winnipeg, as well as combine operations between Rock Island and Grand Island).... so the total picture may not look that much different than what it is today, just would have put Fiat in a different bargaining position.

IHC is still alive and well in the truck and engine division. Actually, with the joint venture of CAT and IH, it's really too bad that CAT distanced itself from the Challenger line, there could have been IH power back in the field again.
 
Numbers stamped in my 126 axle forgings
9 11 6 On each of them.
Jive nicely w/ser #308669 build date Sept of '69

301415.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 301415.jpg
    301415.jpg
    69.6 KB · Views: 106
  • 301415.jpg
    301415.jpg
    69.6 KB · Views: 100
<blockquote><hr size=0><!-quote-!><font size=1>quote:</font>

Jive nicely w/ser #308669 build date Sept of '69<!-/quote-!><hr size=0></blockquote>

I'm not sure how.
 
Ok front tire question. Which is better and for which kinds of uses . There are Tri-ribs,3 ribs, and Ags or the boring standard types of tires. Just curious to hear what everyone else likes and why...
 
Amy, my first thought is what are you using the tire for primaraly such as cutting grass or pushing through snow or plowing a field or tilling gardens.
All four uses could realisticly benefit from a different type of tires.
 
Well Bill, on 2nd thought, maybe not!
There I go, transposing numbers again, geesh, I sure wish i didn't do that!
facepalm.gif


Wonder what the heck they mean, if anything....

Tax time is getting near, I'd better be carefull, Huh?!!
 

Attachments

  • facepalm.gif
    facepalm.gif
    898 bytes · Views: 106
How many different variations of the snow plow sub frames were made?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top