Don - I agree about the brake style being more desirable. When new, the older style works OK, and actually I've never had a problem when I had a PTO driven attachment on the 129, as you'll know plenty quick if the clutch isn't releasing fully ( which is when the release button would wear out). Where I've had the most problems is with an older PTO clutch assembly that has drag on it, where with no belt on the PTO it spins even when the release button is pushing against it - it'll chew a release button up right now, especially the original composite ones. One of the things it took me a while to understand is that button is NOT a throwout bearing in the traditional sense, as it should only be in contact with the rotating "nose" button on the clutch assembly, only during the spindown - when the clutch is released that nose button does not spin and when it is engaged, there is supposed to be clearance between the nose button on the clutch and the release button on the throwout arm...
BTW - my (don't do this at home, kids) solution to the slightly dragging PTO with no belt on it was to install a bypass switch that allows me to leave the PTO engaged and start the engine - since the 129 usually runs bare these days,it's a lot easier than remembering to start it and then engage the PTO and yes, I went through the clutch a number of times, and still ended up with enough drag that it would spin - this was probably exacerbated by using a brass button rather than the composite one..