Lonny B,
I'm not sure the frame on a 100 would be strong enough to handle the stresses created by a hydraulic cylinder big enough for splitting logs without adding a lot of reinforcement. Frames on narrow frame models are bent up sheet metal and not a heavy enough gage to hand the repeated cyclic (fatigue) loads from log splitting. Most log splitters have a heavy steel I-beam to which the cylinder and wedge are attached and the loads are all reacted within that I-beam. If you could mount an I-beam to the frame and keep the loads contained within that beam, that may work, but I personally would hate to see that done to a Cubby. Just my $.02.
I'm not sure the frame on a 100 would be strong enough to handle the stresses created by a hydraulic cylinder big enough for splitting logs without adding a lot of reinforcement. Frames on narrow frame models are bent up sheet metal and not a heavy enough gage to hand the repeated cyclic (fatigue) loads from log splitting. Most log splitters have a heavy steel I-beam to which the cylinder and wedge are attached and the loads are all reacted within that I-beam. If you could mount an I-beam to the frame and keep the loads contained within that beam, that may work, but I personally would hate to see that done to a Cubby. Just my $.02.