Using Rubber ISO Mounts VS steel fabricated mounts

[gdechatham]

I have a Cub Cadet 1450, and it needs new Rubber ISO mounts (engine mounts).

I did a lot of research on what I should do about the mounts- On one hand, Cub Cadet still does make the mounts. On another hand, there is a guy that makes steel mounts that replaces the rubber mounts.

I do understand that using steel mounts would not reduce the original vibration on the quietline series. But, steel does not wear out like the rubber ones do.

So, my question is, does the rubber really dampen the vibrations that much? Or would it just be better to put on steel mounts instead?

I am aware of the rail modification, and I am going to do that, either way if I use rubber or steel.

 

[mbounds]

George L: IMHO, if you are gonna be a puller where short butsts of power and speed are the priority, a short period of vibration isn't much of a consideration.

However!!: If you plan to use your Cub Cadet QL for mowing or plowing where you are going to be on it for long periods, maybe hours, at a time you will likely find the continuous vibration from using the solid mounts very bone tiring and teeth rattling.....

Besides, if replacing the rubber mounts every 25-30 years is too often, then go solid (just make sure your chiropractor stays handy). Personally, I find 25-30 years an acceptable wear-out period. And, yes, I strongly recommend the Iso-Bar modification.

Myron B
CCSupplyRoom