tlavalette
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2015
- Messages
- 87
- displayname
- Tom Lavalette
Why didn't the hydro tractors have a high/low range rear. Especially in the supers.
-
This community needs YOUR help today. With the ever increasing fees of everything (server, software, domain, e-mail) , we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community to help spread our love and knowledge of IH Cub Cadets. You get a lot of great new account perks including access to private forums. If you sign up for annual, I will ship a few IH Cub Cadet Forum decals too in addition to all the account perks you get. You can see what it looks like below.
Sign up here: https://www.ihcubcadet.com/account/upgrades
Why didn't they...?
- Thread starter tlavalette
- Start date
Help Support IH Cub Cadet Tractor Forum:
mgonitzke
Well-known member
Because there is no need for it. Hydrostatic transmission speed is infinitely variable between 0 and the maximum speed.
bwstevens
Well-known member
That and it would have cost money to ditch the transmission from the 40's cub. Actually the power plants at that time didn't over power the hydro .
jlord
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2016
- Messages
- 96
- displayname
- Jim Lord
I think a locking differential operated by a heel plunger would be a preferred option, like the kind that the big tractors have. There are times when that would come in handy.
As long as your heel has the plunger depressed, you've got a live axle.
As long as your heel has the plunger depressed, you've got a live axle.
