Refurbish vs. Restore.
For those of us that have been here for several years I think we can all recall the various discussions on this topic. (I bet I have many of the original discussions in the archives but I don't have the many hours of time available that it would take to look for them so I'll make up definitions based on my memory of the discussions) I recall that we settled on something like the following as a reasonable definition:
Restoration- returning a Cub Cadet to as original condition as possible given the information available, i.e., correctness of color of a given part, having the correct IH headed bolts or WP headed bolts where appropriate, having the correct seat, decals, engine details, etc. Most likely done to a Cub Cadet for show or collector purposes.
Refurbish- cosmetically and mechanically repairing and/or modifing a Cub Cadet to useable condition but retaining nearly original appearance. Color should still be yellow and white or red depending on the model but the shade doesn't have to be correct. Small details don't have to be correct, i.e., it's OK if the washers on the front wheels are white rather than yellow, an Original can have an 8hp replacement engine rather than a 7hp, the S/G can be black, etc. Most likely for a work Cub Cadet where the owner wants a nice looking and operating tractor but isn't concerned about correctness.
Custom- anything goes.
Perhaps we should re-discus this and add the resulting consenses (provided we can reach a consensus) to the FAQ to head off any future arguments on Forum terminology. Comments?
<FONT SIZE="-2">IMO, FWIW, YMMV, My $0.02, Yada, Yada, Yada...</FONT>